The Ferris Conspiracy Forum
Sign up  |   |   |  Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 3 of 4      Prev   1   2   3   4   Next
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #31 
Interview: The transcript of Surrey Police's interview with Savile in 2009 was released this week




__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #32 

__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
HarvienBain

Registered:
Posts: 1
Reply with quote  #33 
...And now the bastards deed ! Good !Another one of them down....can't stomach the bastards
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #34 
Detectives who handled sex crime allegations against Jimmy Savile are referred to police watchdog after no action was taken



[surrey-police-logo-main_jpg_display]




Earlier this year, the CPS criticised Sussex and Surrey police forces for being 'unjustifiably cautious' and failing to properly investigate the allegations.
[_41254382_sussex_badge_203]

The two officers were referred to as DS O and DC T in Ms Levitt's report, and came under fire for wrongly telling the alleged victim that her claims would need to be corroborated before any prosecution.






__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #35 

__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #36 
[surrey-police-logo-main_jpg_display]




__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #37 

Revealed: how Jimmy Savile abused up to 1,000 victims on BBC premises

[image]


__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #38 
Police who let Jimmy Savile escape with decades of child abuse have now used his DNA to try and link him to a string of unsolved deaths


Yorkshire Ripper Peter Sutcliffe with Jimmy Savile and Frank Bruno at Broadmoor mental hospital. Savile once described himself as a 'mate' of the murderer

Yorkshire Ripper Peter Sutcliffe with Jimmy Savile and Frank Bruno at Broadmoor mental hospital. Savile once described himself as a 'mate' of the murderer







__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #39 
The truth about Labour's apologists for paedophilia: Police probe child sex campaign group linked to three top party officials in wake of Savile scandal

Key roles: Harriet Harman and husband Jack Dromey. They were leading officials in the NCCL, which was linked to predatory pedophile group PIE

Key roles: Harriet Harman and husband Jack Dromey. They were leading officials in the NCCL, which was linked to predatory pedophile group PIE







__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #40 
Savile isn’t the only obnoxious paedophile being covered up by the system. 

This revisionism had the effect of giving a post mortem character reference for Thomas Hamilton, signed by Lord Cullen, despite the fact that his abuse of boys at his Loch Lomond camps was well known and had been reported to the police. These and other incidents had made him known to half the police forces in Scotland and had seen him dismissed from the Scout movement

Thomas Hamilton. - See more at: http://www.dunblaneexposed.info/#sthash.iKF2V3Nj.dpuf




__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
caroline

Registered:
Posts: 277
Reply with quote  #41 
opened this post 20 times still showing as unopened perhaps it will stay open now admin?
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #42 
Posted on 25 October 2013 by admin

Sir Fixed it for Jim

How did Jim fix it so that his child abuse was never examined?

Everybody now seems to have known about it so why was nothing done about it?

Did whistleblowers try to get the authorities to act? Or were they put off by his obvious power and influence?

The initial rumours suggested that only one police force, the Surrey Constabulary had investigated an allegation of abuse against Savile in the 1970s, which could not be substantiated.

But then other tales began to emerge about victims of Savile’s abuse being interviewed, but nothing further happening because of who the allegations were against. There are also accounts of victims not complaining because of the prospect of not being believed, due to the power of the alleged abuser.

I find these stories credible. Sir James Winston Vincent Savile, OBE, KCSG was a powerful and influential man, a friend of royalty, world and religious leaders, whereas his victims were mainly children of the opposite sex who were poles apart from Savile in terms of status within the establishment. To me this would explain how hundreds could be criminally assaulted without any action being taken by the forces of law and order.

Although we are all supposed to be equal under the law my experience is that the great and good, titled and influential people, will be treated deferentially by most people including the police and politicians.

I believe most people know this and an ordinary Jane or Joe would be loath to make allegations against the great and good due to the knowledge that those who would assess their complaints would be (either consciously or sub-consciously) biased against a commoner.

In addition to the class/power differential between accuser and accused there is another aspect that prevents complainants coming forward: The fear that a victim of abuse might not be believed can be compounded if/when that victim, damaged by such abuse, goes on to become involved in self-harm, drug abuse, or other crimes. As an addict/criminal, the damaged child could then be portrayed as being unreliable as a truthful witness.

Such fears have been described by the victims of Savile’s abuse and have echoes in the Dunblane tragedy and the charmed life led by Thomas Hamilton.

At the Dunblane Public Inquiry that followed the mass murder of children at Dunblane Primary School the evidence of one anonymous victim of Thomas Hamilton’s sexual abuse on board his cabin cruiser, (Hamilton had two boats the large cabin cruiser, Tropical Linda and the smaller speed boat Lady Sheila, both said to have been bought from the police at unrealistically low prices), at Loch Lomond was traduced by the Lord Advocate’s representative LINK to such an extent that Lord Cullen in his Report concluded that he ” did not find this allegation to have been proved” LINK and in effect allowed Thomas Hamilton to be considered to have been a decent man, with no proven history of sexual abuse!

This revisionism had the effect of giving a post mortem character reference for Thomas Hamilton, signed by Lord Cullen, despite the fact that his abuse of boys at his Loch Lomond camps was well known and had been reported to the police. These and other incidents had made him known to half the police forces in Scotland and had seen him dismissed from the Scout movement.

So to disbelieve disturbed children – who have been damaged by sexual abuse – about the details of the abuse that caused them to be damaged, would appear to be part of a vicious circle of protection for abusers.

“Who would believe you? You are damaged goods!” was probably spoken by Hamilton and Savile to silence any prospective complainants.

The discrediting of the anonymous statement from the abused boy, now a man, of abuse, continued at the Dunblane Public Inquiry, which also discounted his evidence of having fired real bullets from rifles at a hut in Dunblane, that may have been the indoor shooting range at Queen Victoria School. Lord Cullen did not even mention this aspect of evidence in his report.

Lord Cullen did, however, see fit to inform the public in his Report published in September 1996, that the anonymous witness was jailed in August 1996…. a month after the Inquiry closed.

Such scenarios as those highlighted above might seem fanciful to some, but I have personal experience of one aspect. That is: how the establishment can turn a blind eye to allegations of sexual abuse when they come from an ordinary citizen and might implicate the rich and famous; the influential ones at the heart of our establishment.


__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #43 
North Yorkshire Police's handling of abuse claims made against the late DJ Jimmy Savile is to be investigated by the police watchdog.


It is imperative that the public, especially victims, have confidence in the police”

__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #44 
Jimmy Savile:
Who was protecting him for decades, and why?
 
When the Jimmy Savile scandal broke in late 2012, I wasn't particularly interested. A sleazy old DJ and TV presenter groping young girls - highly unpleasant, but not exactly big news as far as I could see.

But then all the pictures and stories started to emerge involving Savile and members of the Royal Family, as well as various prime ministers, and even the top Catholic clergyman in Britain.

[jimmy-savile-prince-charles][jimmy-savile-princess-diana][savcharlie][Jimmy-Savile-Prince-Charles-386x386][charles2][Savile-Brown][Savile-Blair1-500x332][Savile-Thatcher-485x390][savile-heath][savile-philip][png][obrien1]

He had Christmas dinner with Mrs. Thatcher and her husband eleven years in a row, we learned. There was the obvious question of why royalty and prime ministers would want to spend their time with this man, who by all accounts seems to have been quite transparently a self-serving, sociopathic bastard, hiding behind an "eccentric, fun loving" image which he successfully projected in the media (with the media's help!). No one who met him seems to have actually genuinely liked or befriended him, but we were fed this media line that he was some kind of selfless saint, so at the time of his death, his remarkable set of personal connections in royalty and politics seemed quite reasonable to most people. He did a lot of charity work, we all know about that... but these connections involved more than just a few promotional photo opportunities:

"Savile advised Prince Charles over the appointment of a royal aide" (Daily Mail, 5th November 2012)

"Jimmy Savile caused concern with behaviour on visits to Prince Charles" (The Guardian, 29th October 2012)

"Jimmy Savile alarmed Royal staff with lewd behaviour at Palace" (Daily Telegraph, 30th October 2012)

"Jimmy Savile - The Royal court jester" (Daily Express website, 30 October 2011)

"Jimmy Savile's extraordinary access to Margaret Thatcher detailed in secret files" (The Guardian, 28 December 2012)

"Revealed: Jimmy Savile's close friendship with Margaret Thatcher " (28 December 2012)

"Jimmy Savile and the Cardinal: Britain's top Catholic cleric was friend of disgraced TV host" (The Mirror, 26 February 2013)

"UK's top Catholic was long-standing friend of Savile" (Daily Mail website, 28 March 2013) 

Anyone who gets that close to royalty and prime ministers (as well as holding a high-profile position in the BBC for fifty years) is thorougly checked out by the security services (MI5, etc.). That's exactly the kind of thing they're there for - "protecting the realm" includes protecting the sovereign and his/her family from contact with serial child rapists!

And anyone knighted by The Queen (which Savile was, in 1990) is thoroughly vetted to minimise the chance that disreputable behaviour won't come to light and embarrass the British monarchy by association.

So what happened? How much investigation, how much vetting went on? Did the British security services simply suffer from decades of incompetence? How did Savile get so close to the Royal Family? Were they not warned about him? If not, why? And if they were, why did they not shun him?

It now seems that any semi-competent detective could have learned that Savile was involved in some pretty sinister stuff - or at least could have established enough of a suspicion about him that he would have been kept at arms length rather than welcomed into the highest levels of the establishment. Consider:

 



And it gets weirder.

Why did cabinet minister Edwina Currie put Savile in charge of a task force to run Broadmoor high-security psychiatric hospital when he had no qualifications in mental health, prison security, or anything else?

"Jimmy Savile: Questions for Edwina Currie and the BBC" (The Telegraph, 20 October 2012)

"Currie: Savile 'suggested himself' for Broadmoor role" (ITV news website, 21 November 2012) 

His activities as volunteer porter at two morgues (Stoke Mandeville Hospital and Leeds General Infirmary), where he appears to have had unlimited access to the facilities, now seems very suspicious indeed.

Anyone who still believes Savile he was wheeling corspes about out of the goodness of his heart is seriousy naive.

"Savile sex scandal hits horrific new low as former colleague Paul Gambaccini claims on Radio Five Live that DJ was a 'necrophiliac'" (Mail Online, 23 October 2012)

"Hospital to probe Jimmy Savile's lone visits to morgue" (The Sun, 15 October 2012) 

The conclusion I've come to is that this man must have been protected at the highest level. But by who? And why? I don't have the answers, but the more I've looked into this, the more horrific it starts to seem. 

Savile has been directly linked to the Bryn Estyn care home in North Wales where extensive abuse of children went on for years. Despite some very tightly constrained investigations which concluded that there were no paedophile networks involved (supposedly just a few lowly employees acting in isolation), it's now looking certain that there was a very high level cover-up to protect certain VIPs involved in the abuse. There are highly credible claims that Margaret Thatcher's Parliamenary Private Secretary Peter Morrison - a known paedophile at the time, cabinet colleagueEdwina Currie has since admitted - visited Bryn Estyn and took boys away in his car.

"Eyewitness 'saw Thatcher aide take boys to abuse'" (Channel 4 News website, 6th November 2012)

"Sir Peter Morrison 'seen' at abuse care home" (ITV News website, 7th November 2012)

"Jimmy Savile linked to North Wales child abuse scandal" (The Telegraph, 7th November 2012)

"Victims tell of horror inside North Wales care home where gang rape, strip searches and vicious canings were a way of life... and Jimmy Savile was a regular visitor" (Mail Online, 7th November 2012)

So why was Savile visiting this place if there were no networks involved? Interestingly, William Hague (current foreign secretary) was Welsh secretary at the time his Conservative colleague was allegedly visting Bryn Estyn to rape children, and he then went on to set up the Waterhouse Enquiry which supposedly investigated abuse at the home. Despite numerous VIPs being named by victims as having taken part in the abuse, none of their names ever surfaced in the final report, and none were prosecuted.

"The Jillings report: How the truth about North Wales child abuse scandal was suppressed" (The Independent, 11 November 2012)

Did Mrs. Thatcher really not know what her Private Secretary and annual Christmas guest were up to? Why didn't the security services warn her? Was this all just incompetence? 

On 24th October 2012, at the height of the Savile scandal, Labour MP Tom Watson stood up in the House of Commons and nervously asked a question at Prime Minister's Question Time, talking of "clear intelligence suggesting a powerful paedophile network linked to Parliament and Number 10". The House went deathly quiet - none of the usual guffawing and buffoonery - you could have heard a pin drop. Watson has been accused of party-political motives for bringing this up, but does this really matter, considering what's at stake? Check the video, it's truly chilling stuff (and watch David Cameron's face): 

Amazingly, the mainstream media almost completely ignored this bombshell. There was nothingon the BBC TV news about it that evening for example - how the hell can this not be considered newsworthy? It's been kept so well out of the media that when I bring it up with people I meet, no one knows what I'm talking about.

As a result of Watson's question, it seems, investigations have recently been reopened into the case of Peter Righton who Watson refers to. Righton was an internationally respected expert in child care, traveling to conferences, publishing in academic journals, etc. Then he got caught with an extensive collection of horrific child pornography. He was also linked to the notoriousPaedophile Information Exchange, a legal organisation founded in 1974 seeking to promote the idea that adult-child sex was healthy and normal, and to get the legal age of consent lowered to four (!!!) Despite a vigorous campaign by the public against PIE, Home Secretary Leon Brittan was alarmingly reluctant to shut the organisation down. It was eventually disbanded, with a membership list of over 1000 paedophiles, but very few were prosecuted and the network appears to have gone underground).

"Leon Brittan and the Paedophile Information Exchange" (Spotlight on Abuse blog, 3rd March 2013)

various news articles from UK press on PIE (1975-83) (Spotlight on Abuse blog)

This new investigation has led to the Metropolitan Police setting up Operation Fernbridge, looking into the Elm Guest House in West London, where extensive abuse of children from local care homes went on for years. News of this scandal broke in the early 80s, the papers covered it for ten days, rumours of MPs, cabinet ministers, members of the royal household and other VIP's being involved swirled around, and then the mainstream media dropped the whole thing.

various news items from UK papers on Elm Guest House scandal (Spotlight on Abuse blog)

A few things about Fernbridge have leaked out into a few papers, but the mainstream media (BBC and Sky News in particular) have been carefully avoiding the story.

"Elm guest house: Home Office was warned by top Tory 30 years ago of VIP paedophile ring" (The Mirror, 10th February 2013)

"Paedophile ring leader, Colin Peters, linked to Barnes scandal: Convicted barrister in child-sex chain alleged to have abused boys at London guesthouse" (The Independent, 3rd March 2013)

"Police failings put dozens of children at risk from notorious paedophile ring: Documents reveal some visitors at Elm Guest House went on to commit series of child sex offences"

"Cyril Smith named in Barnes abuse case" (The Independent, 27th January 2013)

"Police arrest two men in child abuse inquiry dating back to 1980s: Investigations focusing on allegations of abuse at guest house and care home in Barnes, south-west London" (The Guardian, 6th February 2013)

"Timebomb at Elm Guest House: Pop stars, a bishop and a top politician appear on a list seized by police investigating child abuse at the London hotel in the 1980s" (Daily Mail, 1st February 2013)

Savile has been directly linked to this place, the owner (who still hasn't been arrested and questioned by Fernbridge!) claiming to have been a close friend of Savile!

"Met detectives told of Jimmy Savile's link to Elm Guest House: Haroon Kasir boasted of friendship with Jimmy Savile, and 'was odd after star's death'" (Exaro News, 16th February 2013) 

If you've read this far and still aren't willing to believe Savile was protected and part of VIP child abuse networks then perhaps you should consider that you might be in denial.

Savile has also been linked to the Haute de Garenne childrens home in Jersey where we now horrific abuse went on for decades. Again, a tightly constrained investigation brought a few lowly employees to justice but (as always) no evidence of organised abuse was allowed into the public domain. Just one example of what this place was like: Edward Paisnel, the man who came and played Father Christmas at this children's home for several years was later convicted for extreme sexual abuse and murder. He became known in the press as the "Beast of Jersey", and claimed in his trial to have been part of a secret VIP abuse network on the island. This was dismissed as fantasy. Once again, we were told he was acting alone.

"Paedophile was Santa at Jersey kids' home" (Metro News, 26th February 2008)

"Beast of Jersey paedophile Edward Paisnel was known to visit children’s home" (The Times, 26th February 2008)

When the investigation was going on about the abuse at Haute de Garenne, Savile denied he had ever been there and used his lawyers to block The Sun from printing pictures of him clearly on the premises surrounded by children.

"Jimmy Savile turns to Fox Hayes for action against The Sun" (The Lawyer, 17th March 2008)

[jersey]

When an investigation was completed into why numerous police investigations into alleged abuses by Savile over the decades never led to his prosectution, we were told that it could all be innocently explained by a lack of communication, limitations in the ability of various police forces to cross reference files, minor incompetences, etc.

But wait! We were also told that several of these explosive files on "national treasure" Jimmy Savile were marked as "sensitive" and thereby kept from view. These files didn't mark themselves "sensitive"! So who did, and why? Are there no journalists out there prepared to ask such simple questions?

"Police failings over BBC's Savile exposed in report" (Yahoo News, 12th March 2013)

"Police 'unable to access sex files' on celebrity suspects" (The Guardian, 20th March 2013)

"Nothing to See Here" (Fleet Street Fox blog, 12th March 2013)

"Celebrity Criminals Like Jimmy Savile 'Were Protected By Police'" (Huffington Post, 20th March 2013) 

Perhaps the key to why there's been such a hush in the media about this stuff can be found in the following incident (which, again, went unmentioned in the mainstream media):

Former Mayor of London Ken Livingston, on London's LBC Radio during the height of Savile scandal, said quite clearly that MI5 had been secretly filming the sexual abuse of children at Kincora Boys Home in Belfast, in order to entrap (and thereby be able to blackmail and gain leverage over) certain Ulster politicians. There have been rumours and investigations about this place for years. No one's disputing that abuse went on there. So if untrue, why would a shrewd politician like Livingston risk his career by making such a claim? And if it's true, this means that security services haven't just been covering up abuse like Savile's (for whatever reason), they've also been organising it.

Police incompetence? Isolated incidents? Do you really believe that? I know this is too horrific for some people to contemplate, but it's looking increasingly like powerful paedophile networks have infiltrated just about every sector of the British Establishment (Police, Judiciary, Parliament, Clergy, the Royal Household), and that webs of deceipt, corruption and blackmail are being employed to cover their tracks and achieve aims which the general public know nothing of.

PLEASE get informed about this, talk to your friends about it, spread the word via social media. Yes, it's horrible. Yes, we'd all rather not have to think about it. But if this country is indeed under the control of networks of child rapists, are you just going to shrug and let it happen?

There's a lot of confusion, rumour and badly authored stuff online about this (and the far-right are trying to exploit it in order to discredit all of the mainstream political parties), so check your sources and use some discretion in what information you spread. The following two blogs are (I believe) currently the most complete and factually reliable sources of information on this matter:

Spotlight on Abuse 
The Needle

THIS DARKNESS MUST END.


__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #45 
Who was protecting him for decades, and why?

THIS DARKNESS MUST END.

"35 -mins Into News Item."



__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.