The Ferris Conspiracy Forum
Sign up  |   |   |  Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 1 of 43      1   2   3   4   Next   »
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #1 

..."oh what a sleekit horrible beastie, lurks in yon corridor after the feastie,

Just as they sit doon tay mutter and spin, Shirley McKie causes an almighty din...

    Nay matter whit the hell Jack will dae, Yon Executive will have to pay...

    So haud yer bum tight tay the chair, tae try and stop the leakin air...

    

Shift yersel fae cheek tae cheek, praying to God this disnae leek...

Wherever ye go let yer wind gan' free...

 

But no in the Executive for ye don't represent me!

 

Rabbi Ferris.

 

The Moderator was emailed this today during a discussion with  Mr Ferris (not Rabbi), who thought it was relevant to highlighting the absurdity of the Executive's position to support the members of the SCRO, despite world wide condemnation.

 

And fully supports Shirley McKie's fathers' position that there should be a public enquiry, as much as any father would want justice for their daughter.

 

Both Shirley and her father were once serving police officers, and have an inside knowledge of how the system really operates in relation to statistics, such as how to clear the books over the weekend with a convenient heroin addict in the cells being held on unrelated matters then admitting to almost anything.

 

This is not something new, as within 'The Ferris Conspiracy' (the book), there is a mention of a certain Mr Bernard Docherty who was interviewed over the weekend during the Arthur Thompson Jnr murder enquiry by Detective Patrick Durkin (one of the many names that will be included within the Vendetta DVD).

 

Docherty was a known heroin addict out on bail for housebreaking and had served several years for the same offences.  After Durkin interviewed him, Bernard Docherty provided the following information:

 

1) A meeting took place between Mr Ferris, Mr Glover and Mr Docherty to discuss the assassination of Arthur Thompson Jnr, and supplied the police with further information that was gleaned from him in relation to the murder investigation, that someone like Docherty can become a habitual housebreaker to assassin, is beyond belief. 

 

The jury at the trial were presented with an image of a well dressed man, fully clothed in suit, shirt and tie and any police photograph that they have would show a dirty, scruffy, peasant.

 

Docherty was on the run from the IRA, who had previously knee-capped him, for breaking into homes within the Nationalist community.

 

Quote from today's conversation by Mr Ferris: "If Mr McKie wishes to have a public enquiry into how his daughter was treated by the SCRO, face trial and was acquitted by a jury, should be entitled to that enquiry, the very same public enquiry I asked for on the 12th June 1992, after I was exonerated in what was then Scotland's longest criminal trial".

 

After further discussions with Mr Ferris this morning, he informed me that the DVD 'Vendetta' is currently under production and should be available for ALL members and non-members to be bought exclusively on ferrisconspiracy.com under Online Shop.  Orders for this product will probably be sometime in October this year.  Any further updates will come direct to you from Admin.


__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
Admin

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 3,165
Reply with quote  #2 
First class Hammer6.... first class. 
__________________
I'd rather be hated for what I am, than loved for what I am not".
________________________________
Bilko

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 1,480
Reply with quote  #3 

Bilko thinks the Moderators post above throws up some VERY interesting questions pertaining to this Bernard Docherty testimony among other things.

 

This is Bilko's look at that situation, just to throw it out there to the board, maybe others will have something to add, or a differing view from mine......It's all good. Debate and information are some of the things that will highlight our goals and keep the topic of CORRUPTION and how to end it, on the boil as it were. 

In the dock we had one Paul John Ferris charged with the murder of Arthur "Fat Boy" Thompson. On one hand we had the crown painting a picture of Mr Ferris as being this lethal, calculating, mobster turned assassin, who was a very shrewed individual and a major player in the Glasgow crime scene. Sharp as the proverbial tack who counted many high level dangerous career criminals among his friends and associates.

Yet in the same breath the Crown Prosecution at the trial asked the jury to believe this same, calculating, shrewed, career criminal not only took a lowly heroin-addicted house-breaker into his confidence to discuss a planned murder, but also that this heroin dependant creature was asked to form part of a 'hit squad' with Mr Ferris? This defies all logic.

Of course Mr Docherty did state the above in his evidence at the trial, that is fact. With Mr Ferris's subsequent acquittal, it is obvious this creature Docherty's testimony did not fool anyone. Bilko feels the question now has to be asked why Docherty would stand up in a court of law and under oath lie so blatantly to a jury with this obviously concocted story concerning his meteoric rise up the underworld ladder, from loser heroin addicted petty house-breaker, to friend, confidant, and would be companion in murder to (in the words of the police) One of Glasgow's biggest gangland names Mr Paul Ferris all within a short spell of time?

Bilko's conclusion is that Docherty was in someway coerced into giving that evidence in court by the Crown Prosecution, after he had been briefed by officers of Strathclyde Police dept on what to say. Perhaps Docherty had some charges that he was told would 'disappear' if he told his pre-rehearsed tale in court, perhaps he was threatened that charges would be brought against him for anything the Police felt like charging him with if he didn't give this evidence? Bilko is only looking at possibilities here, I do not know what Strathclyde Police wielded over Docherty's head to give that false testimony, but something must have been offered.

No one can honestly believe this miscreant Docherty decided to fit-up Mr Ferris of his own accord, he would be neither so brave nor so stupid, other than that, he had no self promoting reason to fit him up. So who else other than Strathclyde Police would benefit from this malicious testimony of Docherty's?  Who else would want Paul John Ferris out of the picture by any means necessary?

Arthur Thompson Sr.? A distinct possibility.....Arthur Thompson Sr AND Strathclyde Police?.......Even MORE of a possibility to Bilko's way of thinking at least.

The above mentioned scenario is only one of many discrepancies littered throughout the trial Of Mr Paul Ferris in an attempt to have him convicted. Paul Ferris himself has highlighted in his autobiographal book the Ferris Conspiracy the many dastardly dealings of Strathclydes finest.

 

Mr Ferris had himself asked for a PUBLIC ENQUIRY into the Police CORRUPTION as far back as June 1992 after he was exonerated of the charges.

 

No such PUBLIC ENQUIRY was forth coming, one can only wonder why? Surely a PUBLIC ENQUIRY in that instance would have helped clear the much maligned Strathclyde Police of much of the stench of CORRUPTION that surrounded them. It would be the perfect chance to exonerate them publicly just as Mr Ferris was exonerated at the trial.

Maybe....just maybe.... Some in high EXECUTIVE office felt that a PUBLIC ENQUIRY far from exonerating Strathclyde Police from the allegations of CORRUPTION levelled at them, would in fact ENDORSE the allegations and turn them into FACT for all to see PUBLICLY.

 

Shame on those who give shelter to CORRUPTION and the CORRUPT, those voted into office by the general public, to serve that same public honestly and without prejudice and who then defend and cover up ALL CORRUPT dealings and perpetrators of CORRUPT dealings. Shame on them.

Thankfully Mr Ferris was acquitted of the murder of Arthur 'Fat Boy' Thompson and justice was done despite the false testimonies and lies from those payed to SERVE and PROTECT and from creatures like Bernard Docherty and others.

The murder trial at the time it took place, was the longest running criminal trial ever in UK history. The cost to the tax payer was estimated at £4 million pounds sterling, over three hundred witnesses were cited to give evidence, some would say a PUBLIC ENQUIRY was in order on the basis of finding out why that £4 million pounds sterling and thousands of court hours were wasted on trying to convict a man on the basis of such nonsensical and CORRUPT evidence.

 

Bilko


 


__________________
Law and justice are not always the same. When they aren't, destroying the law may be the first step toward changing it. :D
Admin

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 3,165
Reply with quote  #4 

Hi Bilko... contacted the Moderator, who in turn, contacted Mr Ferris regarding your post.  This is only the tip of the iceberg with the 'Police Hire A Witness Scheme'.

 

Mr Ferris indicated that he will answer the relevant questions that you had posted in relation to Bernard Docherty, and will forward it to Admin, who will contact you direct.


__________________
I'd rather be hated for what I am, than loved for what I am not".
________________________________
Bilko

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 1,480
Reply with quote  #5 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Admin

Hi Bilko... contacted the Moderator, who in turn, contacted Mr Ferris regarding your post.  This is only the tip of the iceberg with the 'Police Hire A Witness Scheme'.

 

Mr Ferris indicated that he will answer the relevant questions that you had posted in relation to Bernard Docherty, and will forward it to Admin, who will contact you direct.

Good stuff admin.  This  'Police Hire A Witness Scheme' as you so eloquently put it needs serious looking into and discussion on this forum. The public need to be made aware that in theory and in a lot of cases in reality the Police can wheel these 'witnesses' out at any trial where they NEED to secure a conviction. Utterly disgraceful and disgusting that this can and does go on. It needs to end! Bilko


__________________
Law and justice are not always the same. When they aren't, destroying the law may be the first step toward changing it. :D
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #6 

The Moderator has consulted with Mr Ferris and here is what he had to Say in relation to Bernard Docherty.

 

I felt compelled to post direct as Admin indicated that she would update you.

 

Quote ' Docherty was out on probation as the courts felt it was appropriate for him to continue with his drugs treatment order despite the fact he already just finished a 5 year sentence for breaking into houses and was caught again. The courts let him out on bail to continue with his drugs treatment and was on the run from the police after committing yet another housebreaking' (no wonder the IRA kneecapped him then?) 

 

'Detective Durkin questioned Docherty when he was eventually arrested within the confines of Baird St police station whilst suffering withdrawal symptoms over the weekend and concocted a statement in conjunction with Durkin.'

 

'Docherty was facing a very hefty sentence as he just finished his 5 years then put on probation and drugs treatment order whilst still braking into houses and this was not lost in his mind as I am sure Docherty would have got another substantial sentence for taking the piss'

 

'He was then informed that his life was at risk and brought into the witness protection scheme but ran away twice only to be caught again and held firmly within a manned area with CCTV until he appeared at the trial'

 

..................................................................................................

 

Bilko the Moderator wishes to inform you that the STAR witness at the 1992 trial was a cretin called Dennis Woodman/Wilkinson who was used as a prosecution witness several times in different cases throughout England and guess what? ALL accused persons had allegedly confessed their involvement in crimes they were remmanded for.

 

He is solely responsible for innocent men being sentenced to over 120 years as he played the part of ........................STAR witness!

 

More to come on that thing!


__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........
Bilko

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 1,480
Reply with quote  #7 

Thank you to Mr Ferris for clarifying the role this despicable toe-rag of an individual played at the bequest and prodding of Detective Durkin Doughnut in concocting a litany of lies and innuendo against Mr Ferris in the 'Fat Boy' trial.

 

We can well surmise the dialogue that ensued between the two over the period of that weekend Docherty spent as a 'guest' of Durkin Doughnut at Baird St, whilst suffering withdrawal symptoms from heroin.

 

We can rest assured Docherty's withdrawal symptoms were short lived, relieved by way of advanced payment for 'services rendered'.  Hence, his agreement to repeat a litany of lies, a concocted story brought about in desperation by Detective Durkin Doughnut to help seal the fate of Mr Ferris at the High Court.

 

I am at a total loss as to which of these two scoundrals is the more despicable......both being equally repugnant and vile in their venomous lies.

 

Bilko well remembers this other monstrously treacherous and nauseatingly self-serving minion Dennis Woodman aka Wilkinson from Mr Ferris's book Ferris Conspiracy.

 

If there is any justice in the world this cretin will die ten deaths, each death ten times more painful than the death before. I am sure i speak for all those his false evidence helped put behind bars when i say that even that punishment  wouldn't suffice as proper retribution for someone of Woodman/Wilkinson's ilk.

 

I look forward to the "More to come" regarding this creature.

 

Bilko


__________________
Law and justice are not always the same. When they aren't, destroying the law may be the first step toward changing it. :D
hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #8 

All of the prosecution witnesses at the FAT-BOY trial will be exposed on the forthcoming DVD.

 

We can give you the FACTS we cannot make your mind up................


__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........


Registered:
Posts: N/A
Reply with quote  #9 

I have read both Ferris conspiracy & vendetta about how they use witnesses but the time will come when the S**T hits the fan and I liked the rabbi burns bit

Admin

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 3,165
Reply with quote  #10 

Hi All... thanks for your posts.  The proverbial shit will indeed hit the fan - sometime this year, would be my guess, but who knows?  Perhaps it is time to call in Mulder and Scully.  REAL1... glad you liked the Rabbi bit... quality eh? 


__________________
I'd rather be hated for what I am, than loved for what I am not".
________________________________


Registered:
Posts: N/A
Reply with quote  #11 

Enjoying these odes by Rabbi Ferris,,it would be brill to see a section of these in his new book!!xxxsteeleyma

hammer6

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 8,395
Reply with quote  #12 

It is a possibility although the publisher would find it pretty difficult to publish them in a crime book................!

 

I will pass on the posts to the Rabbi as I am sure there are more to come and you will read them here among the farcical MINISTER PLEASE section so have fun.


__________________
The TRUTH is out there...........


Registered:
Posts: N/A
Reply with quote  #13 

I see what you mean, maybe a thought for Rabbi in the future though,as i'm sure it would bring pleasure to many.I'll be looking out for any more on here hammer6.xxxsteeleyma

Admin2

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 9,064
Reply with quote  #14 

Yes I am sure a collaboration between Rabbi and Reg would be a light hearted way of getting over serious issues and should be posted on this site.

 

Thanks for the feedback


__________________
FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS
Admin

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 3,165
Reply with quote  #15 

Hi Hammer6... with regards to your last post about the publisher finding it a problem putting a Rabbi Ferris book in the crime section...  didn't they put Les Brown's book and the Slimelord's in the crime section?  And both of those were comical to say the least...


__________________
I'd rather be hated for what I am, than loved for what I am not".
________________________________
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.